Quantcast
trees

Philips’ 42-inch Eco TV Is Perfect For Your Off-Grid Home

Sips less power than a 100-watt lightbulb

19 Comments

phillps.jpg

It doesn’t come in green, but Philips’ new 42-inch Eco TV is certainly sporting some earth-friendly credentials.

Announced at CES 2008, this television is packed with power-saving features; something a few of my off-grid friends might find interesting when considering their next (or first) television. From the article,

“Chief among them is the ability to dim the backlight–by up to five times peak brightness–in response to program material, much like the “local dimming” found on Samsung’s LED-based LN-T4681F. Dimming the backlight in darker scenes has the dual benefit of saving power and improving black-level performance, according to the company. The backlight can also be dimmed via a room lighting sensor, so in dark rooms it will use less power. There’s also traditional a “power-saving” mode that caps the peak light output.”

According to the company, when all of these features are enabled the television consumes only 75 watts of power. Philips used a Kill-A-Watt device hooked to the LCD to show journalists it wasn’t just blowing green PR smoke.  That’s a pretty awesome number when you consider most Americans probably have single lightbulbs that consume more power than this thing.

Additional green features include an excellent stand-by power less than 0.15 watt, lead-free materials in the build, and a recycled box to hold it all during delivery to your home. It helps as well that this television has the looks to appeal to a wide range of consumers. Eco Yuppies — rejoice!

via cnet

19 Comments

  1. Tony said,

    January 8, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    When “going green” becomes affordable instead of trendy I would be more than happy to be part of the solution.

  2. Bill Vincent said,

    January 9, 2008 at 1:25 am

    Um, Tony, 1400usd isn’t that bad for a 42″ LCD. There are plenty of non-green LCD’s in this size for much more.

  3. Franko said,

    January 9, 2008 at 2:10 am

    Tony, i agree with you completely. Buying these sort of products isn’t worth it in the least, unless you’re an uptight, rich, ignorant buffoon who wants to brag to his/her friends that he/she cares about the environment.

    Al Gore just wants your money, wake up people

  4. Michael d'Estries said,

    January 9, 2008 at 8:44 am

    Al Gore wants my money? Right.

    Personally, I’m all for companies spending R&D to develop appliances that use less energy. It will all trickle down in various forms in the end.

  5. Meg said,

    January 10, 2008 at 6:08 pm

    Living off grid is my dream, I’m making a note of this TV for my future solar powered earth sheltered dream house.

  6. Dogear Nation » Blog Archive » Dogear-Nation - Episode 35 - Your Own Little Peep Show said,

    January 13, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    [...] Philips Eco TV –> http://www.groovygreen.com/groove/?p=2413 Frag Dolls –> http://www.fragdolls.com/index.php/about Jawbone collects other headsets at CES [...]

  7. Ekologické bydlení » Blog Archive » Ekologická LCD televize Phillips said,

    January 14, 2008 at 1:24 pm

    [...] groovygreen     Číst dál     Vložit [...]

  8. Apple’s Macbook Air Is The Greenest Laptop Yet » GroovyGreen.com - Start Today :: Save Tomorrow said,

    January 15, 2008 at 4:06 pm

    [...] this notebook consumes the least amount of power of any MAC; so chalk this one up there with your ECO TV for those thinking of jumping [...]

  9. 2008’s most desirable eco-gadgets at EcoStreet - Raising Green Consciousness since 2002 said,

    January 15, 2008 at 7:35 pm

    [...] high-definition LCD television won the “Best in Show” award at CES2008. It’s the perfect telly for your off-grid home with several power saving features meaning it uses less electricity than a 100W lightbulb to run. [...]

  10. The TV For The Eco-Conscious said,

    January 24, 2008 at 3:36 am

    [...] article I have been reading told of a television set that was marketed as an “Eco TV”. Come to think of [...]

  11. Philips’ Eco TV Uses Less Power Than A 100-Watt Lightbulb | Got2BeGreen said,

    January 25, 2008 at 7:44 am

    [...] Source Filed under Electronics on January 25, 2008 – [...]

  12. Green Deal: LED Stick Lights That Last 12 Years For $15 » GroovyGreen.com - Start Today :: Save Tomorrow said,

    February 6, 2008 at 11:39 am

    [...] the same effect as their conventional counterparts while lasting much, much longer. The EcoTV that uses less energy than a 100 watt light bulb? Gotta have it. The washing machine that efficiently cleans clothing in less than 14 minutes? Talk [...]

  13. how does a off grid home get power said,

    June 4, 2008 at 6:43 am

    [...] with several power saving features meaning it uses less electricity than a 100W lightbulb to run.http://www.groovygreen.com/groove/?p=2413Morgan County energy code on hold – Fort Morgan TimesThe idea is to try to lessen the demand on the [...]

  14. Dave said,

    June 23, 2008 at 4:53 pm

    Franko is an idiot, you can buy this TV at Costco for $1099 and reduce your electricity bill and usage. Sounds like a deal to me. Oh, only a “buffoon” does not care about the environment.

  15. Philips’ Energy Saving 42-inch Eco TV » EnviroGadget said,

    September 15, 2008 at 5:10 am

    [...] CNET via GroovyGreen Filed in Energy Saving, Home Gadgets  Email to a [...]

  16. Solar Feeds Gadgets » Philips’ Energy Saving 42-inch Eco TV said,

    September 16, 2008 at 8:04 am

    [...] Source: CNET via GroovyGreen [...]

  17. Brilliant and Bizarre Off-the-Grid Green Designs and Technologies | WebEcoist said,

    February 24, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    [...] (image via: Groovy Green) [...]

  18. Brilliant and Bizarre Off-the-Grid Green Designs and Technologies « WickedEco said,

    March 15, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    [...] (image via: Groovy Green) [...]

  19. bob said,

    April 15, 2009 at 4:21 am

    I have a budget ($600) 42″ Vizio from Costco that bottoms out at ~65W with everything turned down, and is in the neighborhood of ~85W with the backlight after calibration. All things considered, I don’t think an extra 10W is worth $500 extra, especially since it looks fine with the backlight off and brightness off provided the sun’s glare isn’t too bad.

Leave a Comment