
An eccentric group of community-minded leaders shuffled in to the room. They were leaders from the dozen or so neighborhoods of Bloomington, Indiana. The group known as CONA – Council of Neighborhood Associations – normally meets to address issues of public concern, such as parking availability, safety, noise complaints and reducing blight. Tonight, however, their guest was Peter Bane who was coming to give a presentation on permaculture and discussion on “how these ideas can help shape neighborhood projects and planning for Bloomington.”
The room settled in as Peter entered, looking sage-like with a small group of permaculture “disciples” in tow. Soft spoken and even keeled, Peter jumped right into his lecture. Tonight’s meeting would deal with much more existential issues than noise ordinances and neighborhood watch groups. A few jaws dropped and eyes widened as Peter matter-of-factly discussed the coming peak in global energy supplies, and the need for quick and prudent action at the community and city level to prepare for this eventuality. He brought up the negative effects of globalization of the economy and its unsustainable future. Although Peter’s talk was meant to open eyes, he wasn’t there to focus of problems, but to talk solutions.
These solutions would not come from federal nor state government, but from the people. He believes that “we lack the political will, but have the technology to maintain life sustainably.” What followed, Peter admitted was a quick overview of the tenets of permaculture, and how they apply to Bloomington. However, his lecture could have applied to many small cities throughout the northern half of the country, adequate rainfall, walkable streets, and ringed by farms. His nearly 2 decades of workshops and teaching compacted as neatly as possible into a 20 minute lecture and discussion. Peter was generous enough to let us record and broadcast his appearance.
You can find it here:
I’ll hit the high points of his lecture:
Peter felt that the answer to solving many of the approaching problems lies in our behavior and involves three tenets: 1. Care for the Earth, 2. Care for people – empowering and enabling others to take care of themselves, ending the centralization of processes, and 3. Fair Share – using less fossil fuels, less resources. After we have what we need, we should share it with others in need. He mourned the fact that we are 2-3 generations from the land. That many do not realize the effort that it takes to grow food and sustain life. He went over Permaculture as a design system, involving incorporation of living areas and food production; Cycling of energies, where waste of one system becomes the feedstock of another; and Common Sense, “although sense is not that common anymore.”
He cited phosphorus as an example of a needed nutrient that we were literally “flushing away” in our toilets.
He believed that it was vital to relocalize the production of food and goods, to shorten the supply chain. He believed that Bloomington had the potential to generate all of “the basics” locally. Here is where Permaculture could really assist in the planning process. He spoke of neighbors producing food in backyard and roof top gardens, incentives for upgrades and local rain water collection from roof tops, and the planting of community edible trees along city streets. Also, moving food production currently outside the city to it’s edge. Growing trees among the crops, local fish raising integrated into the farms as well. Now was the time to plan, while natural and financial resources were abundant.
Speaking directly to the neighborhood groups on what they could do to promote this way of life, he had four suggestions:
1. Urban Design
- traffic calming to allow safer pedestrian and bike travel
- promoting continued development of the compact center of the city
- increasing pedestrian and bike routes
- continued development of public transportation
Incorporation of Edible Public Landscaping
- to be started as a private initiative then try to increase public support
- community gardens and green spaces purchased and developed
- would add to local food security
2. Solar Design – Retrofitting of current structures (or retrofitting code for building)
- re-orient energy use towards sun
- promote energy efficiency, and educate homeowners in the importance of solar orientation
- initiatives like in Great Britain to add 4-6 feet of greenhouse to the southern side of homes.
- solar hot water heaters
e.g. his 1950’s ranch home. He tore out a 24 foot south side wall and put in a wall of glass windows, turning his garage into a living room heated by the sun.
3. Water Management
- “green roofs” and water catchment systems that would “drought-proof the city”
- water tanks in each home, or cycle the water into backyard ponds.
- using “swales” to direct run off to follow the contour of the land and be absorbed or directed into wetlands.
Here he spoke of community groups sponsoring an award for the “best backyard farm”, or awarding grants for water catchment. He considered this a good sell to members of the city council, considering the vast amount of money spent on ditches and culverts for directing the overflow of rainwater in the current sewer system. He also advocated the use of permeable paving in roads versus the digging of more ditches, and the increased planting of trees in parking lots which could provide not only shade on a sunny day, but could also help in retain rainwater and reduce runoff.
4. Food Security
- local farmers markets supported
- encourage community gardens near each neighborhood, noting that the city could re-purchase land for that purpose. (Also that this is what sustained the Russians after the fall of Communism.)
- answer to food security for the city lies in “lots of small gardens, close, within walking distance”
- Urban Farmers: city could purchase and acquire potential food growing land in or near city (see Eugene & Portland, OR). Then urban “share croppers” could tend this land for the community, or the same could be done in private unused lots.
He finished by answering many of the groups questions, and offered to give future extended lectures on the ideas presented. His vision of Bloomington included a vibrant city center with identifiable neighborhoods, the rich garden landscapes and expanded bike and bus transportation options.
I recommend taking some time to watch the video above. Think about how these concepts can be applied to your city or neighborhood, and how you can help facilitate these changes.
Peter Bane is the publisher of Permaculture Activist. We thank him for his time and for his conversation after the meeting. Groovy Green wishes him luck as he helps to shape the future of Bloomington.
For more information on Permaculture, check out or buy Permaculture: A Designer’s Manual the source of the small snippet of picture.